?

Log in

overlook

Carbon dioxide, fundamental to the life cycle, declared a "dangerous pollutant"

Carbon dioxide, fundamental to the life cycle, has been slandered a "dangerous pollutant" by the so-called Environmental Protection Agency of the U.S.A, in anticipation of the upcoming "Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty" talks on December 18 (to replace the Kyoto Treaty which expires in 2012). The EPA plans to push to cut carbon emissions 80 percent by 2050. The upcoming treaty is being endorsed by over 300 international companies, including such Big Oil names as Shell and British Petroleum (does this make you go "hmm"?).

The EPA's decision to categorize carbon dioxide as a dangerous pollutant is total gutter science, of course, but then the idea is not to care for the planet, but rather use this lie to impose a massive cap and trade derivatives scheme, carbon taxation and rations, one-child policies and compulsory sterilization, and finally genocidal global depopulation on humanity, already being accomplished through rising massive starvation, as a result of a doubling world food prices, due to huge areas of farm land being used to grow worthless, wasteful biofuels.



Sen. James M. Inhofe (R-Okla.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, released the following video responding to EPA’s finding that greenhouse gases from mobile sources endanger public health and welfare:

This bureaucratic nightmare is based on flawed science. Lisa Jackson, Obama’s EPA Administrator, admitted to me publicly that EPA based its action today in good measure on the findings of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC. She told me that EPA accepted those findings without any serious, independent analysis to see whether they were true. Of course, we now have thousands of emails showing several of the UN’s top scientists apparently evading laws requiring transparency, defaming scientists with opposing viewpoints, and manipulating data to fit preconceived opinions. They cooked the science.
For example, some of the scientists involved worked to exclude inconvenient facts — most notably the fact that there has been no global warming since 1998. The scandal, which has come to be known as “climategate,” has rocked the scientific community. The Atlantic Monthly said, “The stink of intellectual corruption is overpowering.” And the U.K. Telegraph said, “This is the worst scientific scandal of our generation.”
The UN is investigating it; leading academic and scientific institutions are investigating it; and I am investigating it. Yet, Democratic leaders in Congress and the Obama Administration have dismissed it. I agree with Sen. Joe Lieberman, who said of climategate, “We ought to be demanding that that be cleaned up. We ought to be angry about it.”
The endangerment finding also will have virtually no impact on global warming. That’s because India and China, two of the world’s leading emitters of CO2, are left out. Of course, next week President Obama will try to spin “commitments” from India and China to address their emissions — yet these commitments will be effectively meaningless.

“CO2 is not a pollutant. In simple terms, CO2 is plant food,” notes John R. Christy

, professor of Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Alabama. “The green world we see around us would disappear if not for atmospheric CO2. These plants largely evolved at a time when the atmospheric CO2 concentration was many times what it is today. Indeed, numerous studies indicate the present biosphere is being invigorated by the human-induced rise of CO2. In and of itself, therefore, the increasing concentration of CO2 does not pose a toxic risk to the planet.”

This, however, is merely the fruits of old labor. The 1991 Report, “The First Global Revolution”, published by the secretive Club of Rome, openly admitted how they were planning to exploit such a contrived hoax in order to further their agenda:

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself."

The very fact that this has happened gives me pause. I stop, almost in disbelief at what I am reading. 'People cannot actually be falling for this!' I think to myself. It all feels so surreal, like Twilight Zone or something. But then again, I suppose this should not be surprising given the fact that people who have been duped by this fraud, have actually tried to ban water.

Individuals like Al Gore, Phil Jones, Maurice Strong, John Holdren and the like are not true environmentalists. They don't actually care how their policies adversely affect the planet and don't challenge the ecocidal corporate status quo in any meaningful way except as it serves their political and economic agendas. They are hypocrites who have hijacked the once radical environmentalist movement to serve their Malthusian, Social Darwinist, and eugenicist plans. They will not address true environmental dangers and evils, like military toxic waste dumping, genetically modified crops, human-animal hybrids, installations like the High Active Auroral Research Program, military and civilian nuclear accidents, tanker ships (a mere 16 of which equal the pollution of all registered automobiles on the planet!), contaminated water (fluoride, chlorine, rocket fuelandrogens (and see the results!), psychotropic drugs, heavy metals, radioactive waste) and carcinogenic processed foods, ridiculous and dangerous geoengineering experiments, or matter/antimatter collisions.

I pray that all those who truly appreciate our planet and wish to care for it in a smart and truly sustainable way, would recognize the hypocrisy of these corporate globalist environmentalists and rage against these lies or "breathe free" may become a bygone slogan.

Update I: The BBC reported that, "Negotiations at the UN climate summit have been suspended after developing countries withdrew their cooperation" (no surprise considering the IMF and the western constituents conspired to force them to implement the harshest measures, freezing their development (no competition, you see), resulting in continued poverty.

Comments